Two executives criticized Ms. Jones’s plan, based on three individuals who had been at the assembly and weren’t licensed to debate it publicly. In specific, Susan Plagemann, the chief enterprise officer of Condé Nast’s type division, challenged Ms. Jones at size, saying the plan could be tough to promote to advertisers. To defuse the strain, Ms. Wintour banged her fist on the desk, saying, “We need to move on,” based on the three individuals who had been at the assembly.
Ms. Plagemann, who’s white, joined the corporate in 2010 as Vogue’s chief enterprise officer and labored carefully with Ms. Wintour; in 2018, she was elevated to her present job. Three folks with information of the matter mentioned she was vocal about her unfavourable view of Vanity Fair beneath its new editor.
She had criticized Ms. Jones’s decisions of canopy topics, telling others at the corporate that the journal ought to function “more people who look like us,” two of the folks mentioned. A third individual mentioned he had heard her use phrases expressing an analogous sentiment. All the folks mentioned they interpreted the phrase and comparable remarks as referring to well-off white girls who undertake an aesthetic widespread among the many trend set.
Through a Condé Nast spokesman, Ms. Plagemann denied making these statements and denied expressing a dim view of Ms. Jones’s Vanity Fair.
In the interview on Friday, Mr. Lynch addressed Ms. Jones’s stewardship of the journal extra broadly. “The challenge with her taking that new direction would be alienating some of the traditional Vanity Fair audience,” he mentioned. “I really applaud what she’s done.”
The rebellion at Condé Nast was overdue, some workers members mentioned. “We’ve been asking for change for months now,” Sohla El-Waylly, an assistant editor at Bon Appétit, mentioned in an interview.
In the Tuesday assembly with Bon Appétit workers members, Mr. Lynch mentioned he hoped to show a dedication to range with the selection of Mr. Rapoport’s alternative. Later within the name, he instructed that some workers members wished to harm Bon Appétit financially to result in change, a remark that irked some within the assembly.