How Boeing Sold Its 737 Max | NYT News

Boeing introduced the 737 Max as a reliable fuel- and cost-efficient solution to air travel in the 21st century. After two fatal Max crashes, all of the Max aircraft in the world are believed to have been grounded.

Subscribe: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
More from The New York Times Video: http://nytimes.com/video
———-
Whether it’s reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It’s all the news that’s fit to watch.

21 thoughts on “How Boeing Sold Its 737 Max | NYT News

  • March 15, 2019 at 12:43 am
    Permalink

    If people make a quick search in if Boing vc Airbus accidents they’ll never get in Boing again.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 12:44 am
    Permalink

    What propaganda are we being fed today?

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 1:01 am
    Permalink

    Boeing employee: Sir we have re-designed the plane for more fuel economy, space and ambiance. But the plane doesn't seem to be stable as before.

    Boeing Chairman: WTF its 737 max it has to be big and efficient. What are pilots paid for? Add some weight to the tip and rush to the ad agency for its new tagline Cheaper Bigger Better THE FUTURE IS HERE!

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 1:27 am
    Permalink

    Its is beautiful plan but not beautiful then the human 🥺

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 1:44 am
    Permalink

    Look up at the passing jetliner and be glad you're on the ground. Look at the semi in your rearview mirror and be glad it it is not computer-driven, yet.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 1:57 am
    Permalink

    The flight path of Ethiopian 737 shows that this plane finished it's flight and landed at the airport. This is a fake crash!! Bad people on plane faking death.
    Go to: Red Pill News Wednesday Night Livestream 03/13/19 (red pill 78) @ 57min. 49sec on stream.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 2:05 am
    Permalink

    Why weren’t pilot’s informed of this obvious change? After the Lithium-Ion battery failure in the 787 it seems Boeing is more concerned with growth than with safety!

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 2:19 am
    Permalink

    Boeing and FAA mafia screwed up again

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 2:34 am
    Permalink

    The reason they didn’t change the name idiots is because it’s still a 737 almost the same as the 737-800 but it’s maxed with better engines better comfort and better fuel efficient when you said they aren’t that new they are sooo much better than the original 737

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 3:04 am
    Permalink

    Whenever some manufacturer of machines redesigns somethingand says "mwah, they should not be notified of the changes" you should be very worried.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 3:14 am
    Permalink

    I hope it wasn't an integer overflow bug…

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 3:41 am
    Permalink

    Ladies and Gentlemen, meet Airbus! A manufacturer that has a safer track record than Boeing.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 4:22 am
    Permalink

    Engine more up front make the plane tail heavy???????????

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 4:34 am
    Permalink

    Any changes to any planes systems should always be trained, that’s negligent. You can’t play stupid games like that with planes

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 4:48 am
    Permalink

    The plane need to be recertified internationally after fix…
    FAA is not trustworthy anyone.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 5:03 am
    Permalink

    Boeing should be sued for the cost of life. By reducing cost they made a unstable plane

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 5:21 am
    Permalink

    Im a former 737 (800 and 400) and current 747 pilot. I cannot believe the design flaws around the MCAS system that will essentially nose dive the aircraft, overriding the pilots controls, based of the data from a single Angle of Attack probe. I would not let my family fly on a 737 MAX until the issue is rectified. Boeing has tried to blame the pilots in the Lion Air crash but shame on Boeing for designing a plane that put them in the position they found themselves in – wrestling the controls while the plane nose dived.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 5:28 am
    Permalink

    Sounds familiar to 787 but 737 has had deadly history

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 5:51 am
    Permalink

    Being over-informed is better than under-informed for safety reasons in case of inflight issues for pilots.

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 6:01 am
    Permalink

    Amazing how everybody suddenly becomes an expert on the airline industry when things like this happen

    Reply
  • March 15, 2019 at 6:31 am
    Permalink

    WTF New York Times critizising a US company? How dare you do journalism!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Important This site makes use of cookies which may contain tracking information about visitors. By continuing to browse this site you agree to our use of cookies.