Renewing ‘Vows’: How the Times Wedding Section Is Changing

Gender Letter helps you retain up with the world, and the ladies shaping it. Tell me what you assume at

This yr is winding down, readers, and I hope that for you all, Thanksgiving has been a lovefest (or extra realistically, low on household drama).

In that spirit, I needed to take a second to speak about considered one of my favourite long-weekend responsible pleasures: studying about different peoples’ weddings.

For many people, The Times’s Wedding part conjures scenes from “Sex and the City,” when Carrie and the gang collect to hate-read tales of Manhattan upper-crusters in love over Sunday brunch.

I requested LeAnn Wilcox, the Times weddings editor — and a former a replica editor on the sports activities desk, amongst others — how Weddings has modified since she took over as editor two years in the past… and to debunk a few of the persistent myths about her job.

[Want to submit? You can do so here. No Ivy-league degree necessary.]

But just because you submit, doesn’t mean you are in. And just because you are chosen doesn’t mean we take your word for everything. These announcements are reported and fact-checked.

How do you decide whom to choose?

I don’t choose couples because they are old-school money, are Harvard and Yale elites, have Mayflower ancestors — though I might choose them. I try my best to have a selection of interesting and diverse people every week in our pages.

Some would argue that having a wedding section at all is pretty retro. Aren’t there more substantive stories we could be telling?

People are interested in other people and their love stories. What’s not to like about love? Weddings, I think, are a guilty pleasure.

I’ll admit, it’s hard to shake the patrician image some people have of our pages, but if they actually read the pages, they might be surprised.


  • Tis the season — to say no. Here’s how to turn down holiday obligations without your life exploding in a fiery ball of chaos. [The New York Times]

  • Women are more stressed than men. Domestic duties and emotional labor add up. Here’s what the data says, and how to take care of yourself. [The New York Times]

  • Thanksgiving, debunked. It may be the day after turkey day, but there’s still time to drop some truth bombs. [The New York Times]

  • 900 pounds, 70 spikes and three million crystals. No, it’s not a newly discovered planet, it’s what makes up the star that will sit atop this year’s Rockefeller Center Christmas tree. [The New York Times]

  • Latkes, kugel, jelly doughnuts. Here are some of our favorite recipes for Hanukkah, which starts Dec. 2. [The New York Times]


Source link

Featured Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Advertisements